EMAIL FROM NYPD DETECTIVE SYLVESTER GE TO SUNNY SHEU EXPLAINING DETAINMENT

From:	GE, SYLVESTER (SYLVESTER.GE@nypd.org)
Sent:	Wed 1/06/10 5:21 PM
To:	sunny sheu (sunnysheu@hotmail.com)

Hi Sunny,

The FBI agent did indeed contact me yesterday.  The detectives from the DA squad were investigating a case of Aggaravated Harassment, which has to do with a letter that you had sent to the judge.  They therefore were within their lawful rights to investigate.  

However, in regards to your complaint about the detectives' failure to provide you with their name and shield, as I had informed you that complaint is being investigated by Detective Bureau's Investigations Unit.

Truly,

S GE


"The FBI agent did indeed contact me yesterday.  The detectives from the DA squad were investigating a case of Aggaravated Harassment, which has to do with a letter that you had sent to the judge.  They therefore were within their lawful rights to investigate."

______________________________________

HERE IS THE LETTER SHEU "SENT TO THE JUDGE" that was the basis of a charge of Aggravated Harassment. How can this letter be considered "harassment" of ANY kind?

----------------------------------------------------

Hon Joseph Golia

NYS Supreme Court                                                                  1/6/2009

                                      Index: 31307/2001

It’s over 8 years,we have been prohibited to have any NY CPLR most basic “due process”…to discovery, to deposition, to subpoena to counter claim, to cross claim again and again and our 3^rd party summon has been ignore ,too.

          After contacted NYPD,Commissioner Mr. Raymond W.  Kelly , Lut. Comofrty in 109 agreed that Det Keith Ng and Det.Kin Lee who investigation the crime should testify to you about the bank’s officer and closing lawyer violated law and the bank’s closing lawyer internationally accepted fake deposit of Residential contract of sales,fake money order,fake check, falsify bank records to endorsed the fraudulent mortgage and got some money for himself.

There are no reasons you free all the criminals $0 dollars of judgment at all.

Would you mind to schedule a hearing as soon as possible?

New York Penal - Article 240 - § 240.30 Aggravated Harassment in the Second Degree

Penal 
 
  § 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree.

    A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent  to  harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she:

    1. Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, by telegraph, or by mail, or by  transmitting  or  delivering any  other  form  of  written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or

    (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means  or  otherwise  with a  person,  anonymously  or  otherwise, by telephone, by  telegraph, or by mail, or by transmitting or delivering any other form of written communication, in a manner  likely  to  cause annoyance or alarm; or
    

    2.  Makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication; or

    3. Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects  another  person  to physical  contact,  or attempts or threatens to do the same because of a belief or perception  regarding  such  person's  race,  color,  national origin,  ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct; or

    4. Strikes, shoves, kicks or  otherwise  subjects  another  person  to physical  contact thereby causing physical injury to such person or to a family or household member of such person as defined in  section  530.11 of the criminal procedure law.

    5.  Commits  the  crime  of  harassment  in  the  first degree and has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within  the  preceding  ten years.

    6.  For  the  purposes  of  subdivision  one of this section, "form of written communication" shall include, but not be limited to, a recording as defined in subdivision six of section 275.00 of this part.

Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

QUESTIONS:

WHO FILED THE COMPLAINT OF AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT AGAINST SUNNY SHEU?

WHY WAS THE IDENTITY OF THE COMPLAINANT DENIED, EVEN TO SUNNY SHEU AND TO THE BACKSTAIR NEWS, EVEN WHEN DEMANDED BY FOIL?

IF SHEU WAS SUSPECTED OF "AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT, WHY WAS HE NEVER EVEN CHARGED?

IS THE INTENT OF SHEU'S LETTER TO "harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person", OR TO ASK THE JUDGE TO DO THE RIGHT THING?

GE  writes that the "complaint [regarding the detectives not showing IDs] being 

investigated by Detective Bureau's 

Investigations Unit." What were there findings?

If the FBI investigated Sheu's complaint 

against the NYPD, why does the FBI insist it 

has NO RECORDS on Sunny Sheu?